Cheery travel announcers have once again been treating us
this bank holiday with the implications of ‘earlier accidents’. It’s another radio cliché. All accidents were
earlier.
If what they mean is that the accident is just about cleared
away, but I’ll still face some residual delays, then, in fact, I’m still being
delayed owing simply to ‘an accident’, aren’t I? To a motorist, there is little difference
between being delayed by an accident whilst the metal is still smouldering; or by
a man in a fluorescent jacket sweeping the detritus from the road.
They do love these extra words, don’t they, these travel
announcers. Roads are ‘closed off’
rather than closed. And roadworks are
always ‘ongoing’. As opposed to what exactly?
Call me thick, if you like, but on a motorway, I often don’t
know whether I’m driving North or South, so telling me there’s a delay East-bound is of little value to
me. All I know is where I’m driving to. Motorway junction numbers are a similar mystery. I think I know which ones I use
regularly, but I couldn’t swear to it. Can you help me in your bulletins please?
Trains often appear too complex for travel announcers. After
a cluster of words about the 'railway network' (what?), they will say ‘check with your travel company'. Cheers; that's useful. And when we do get a train mentioned, it’s
often one from Crewe. I’d prefer if you told me if it was the one I get on; given, frankly, I have no idea whether its journey started from Crewe or not.
I heard today of some problems on the arterial routes. The what? I’ve rarely heard that word mentioned
anywhere else. Apart from on travel bulletins.
"Do allow a little extra time for your journey". As opposed to thinking you may get there quicker owing to the accident?
And, when the snow falls, "don't go out unless you absolutely have to". I often wonder if driving to work qualifies as a necessity or not.
Peter Stewart reminds me of 'stagger your journey'. As he rightly suggests, doing that is impossible unless each driver liaises with everyone else.
Oh, and 'busy owing to the sheer volume of traffic'. That'll just be 'busy' then.
Peter Stewart reminds me of 'stagger your journey'. As he rightly suggests, doing that is impossible unless each driver liaises with everyone else.
Oh, and 'busy owing to the sheer volume of traffic'. That'll just be 'busy' then.
In focus groups, listeners insist that radio has the
inside track on travel news. They
believe that we have information they cannot access. And, if assembled by someone who knows what
they are doing, that’s true. And those great eye-witness reports which radio can
call upon are truly unsubstitutable.
I’ve written before about the wonders of passive language,
where ‘drivers are advised to...’. Not only is it passive, it’s third person,
suggesting you are talking about the listeners rather than to them. How odd.
B road numbers in town centres are another mystery. They often exist only in the minds of those
purveying the travel news. Names usually make more sense.
Thank goodness for the RDS travel alerts. One of those lovely ideas which must
have sounded great on paper. I have yet
to meet anyone who attaches any value to it.
It does, however, offer great sport for BBC locals who like to press the
button when you are in Brighton, and alert you to some temporary traffic lights
in Evesham. Preferably loudly. Car manufacturers
kindly do allow one to switch this device off and on, or reduce the volume; but
they have all clearly reached an international accord to hide such controls away as
well as possible.
BBC Local Radio has quietly switched away from dispensing
its own travel news to deploying outside contractors. Many such broadcasters are good on-air,
actually, with an enviable command of the road network. It’s inevitable, however, that they will not
know all the crazy pronunciations which pop up in every broadcast area. As a result, those poor presenters sometimes get them
wrong. And nothing. Yes, nothing, annoys
a BBC local radio listener more than a presenter who gets a pronunciation wrong. In honesty, when the BBC prides itself on being purveyor of all things local, and
travel info pops up as frequently as it does, I’m puzzled about how this decision to farm things out was taken without civil unrest.
Like rather too many items on radio, we are routinely informed at the outset who is reading
the travel news. Not quite sure why. Do any listeners ever remember the name, unless it belongs to a
presenter who pops up on the same shift ever day and injects a little personality,
where a case can be made for relationship and trust? That pervasive self-identing
on radio goes back to BBC wartime news,
and it’s a habit which has stuck with us.
The War is over.
Radio is now not the only source for travel news, but its influence
is still hugely powerful. Focus groups confirm that. Radio can not
only tell you what’s happening – it understands.
The best travel news translates clinical information from a variety of reliable sources into the informal 'you' language
you’d use if you phoned a friend to warn them of a problem. It then
keeps you in touch with that dynamic situation whilst you are on the move.
Radio also reassures. When you’re in a jam there’s something comforting to know why - and that
your plight has been recognised by ‘ the radio’. Giving you a sense of unity. Making you part of something.
Half the job on-air is putting
your arm around those travellers.
Old travel bulletin memories, recalled here courtesy Andy Walmsley
Old travel bulletin memories, recalled here courtesy Andy Walmsley