In our adult
lives we are required to perform all sorts of duties. We are asked to fill in tax
returns or benefit forms; take the driving theory test; compare energy tariffs, fill in mortgage and
job applications; and vote on who runs the country.
Yet it is
believed we are too daft to know that when we pick up the phone to call a radio
station or text, it might not be free…but might cost our ‘standard call/text charges’.
Our ‘standard call charges’ being called ‘standard call charges’ because they
are, well, ‘standard’.
Radio and
TV programmes are replete with dull announcements saying the blindingly obvious.
Wasting everyone’s time.
I can
probably understand the merits of announcements suggesting I am going to be
charged significantly extra than I might imagine, but there are even
requirements to sing and dance about the amounts of pennies few would
bother to pick up from the street.
You don’t
need to tell us that picking up the phone might cost us something. We know that.
We don’t have signs outside shops saying that buying things might cost us. Or
signs in pubs saying drinks might not be free. And I don't recall Jean Metcalfe having to bother announcing the price of a stamp when she requested Family Favourites' letters.
If you use
Twitter, you’ll have seen them before. It was clearly a ‘just for amusement’
question, with no prize listed - but it was evidently felt by Head Office that the poll Tweet had
to be accompanied by a second Tweet with a link to a terms and conditions
document.
I clicked on the supplementary message, praying for a parody - but no.
We know such things are free. We know they are run by Twitter. We know they are a bit of fun. Goodness, we know it all.
The painful prose was, no doubt, approved painstakingly in some nice central London
office by people whose salaries we are paying.
We probably have more cause to
be alerted to the cost of unnecessary compliance procedures which have resulted
from the over-regulation of this sector, when the pendulum swung too far from poor regulation.
Is it time to credit our citizens with an ounce of common sense and free our
media from the sort of pointless coda which serves no-one?
Is it time for individuals to take responsibility for their own lives, and not expect the ASA's advertising rules to prevent us from eating too much; nor Ofcom's content rules to stop us being violent?
Is it time for individuals to take responsibility for their own lives, and not expect the ASA's advertising rules to prevent us from eating too much; nor Ofcom's content rules to stop us being violent?
Grab my book 'How to Make Great Radio' now on Amazon. Available in print and e-book. Food for thought for today's presenters and producers - new and experienced.
I guess it's a reflection of society generally. Time to create those T&Cs? Probably five person days. Time to deal with *one* complaint (with accompanying Daily Mail coverage), ten person days?
ReplyDeleteIt's prevalent universally. Somewhere the root cause feels like too many lawyers chasing too little genuine demand, but that's a different and bigger discussion.