Big is beautiful. Unless you’re a BBC local radio station.
The larger the area, the lower the reach %. It’s not the
fault of the folk who work at the larger stations – they likely work just as
hard - and are also in more competitive cities with radio aplenty – and, in
London, with head on commercial competition for the talk ears.
Are there other reasons? Is there something about larger communities
which means they feel increasingly less ‘local’?
BBC local radio in London, the
West Midlands and Manchester has always faced a tough challenge; and the BBC
has tried a number of approaches in those areas, with both format solutions (GMR/GLR) and opt-out services, for example, 'Heartlands' in East Birmingham from BBC WM.
Elsewhere, there has been a mix of approaches over the years. The BBC has amalgamated some services, only to choose
to split them off again later. Others have remained amalgamated after previous
rounds of budget cuts - and others retain some degree of sub-localisation.
It’s interesting looking at the context of other media. Around the
country as daily press titles in significant cities fall, some pretty decent online hyper-local titles rise, seemingly well supported by local readers and businesses.
With no printing overheads, they can serve small communities where a local
press title would be unsustainable.
Whilst youngsters adore their city living, families may choose
to start their families in the suburbs. This is ‘where they live’, not the big
city down the road. Their high street is the one where they push the pram in then
morning and meet their friends later. Town
centres which once pulled down the shutters at five o' clock now have bijoux restaurants with blackboards outside and thriving pubs which stay
open late – at which time the revellers can stagger home. At a time when arguably cities are becoming
more homogeneous, is there a new sense of pride in smaller communities?
It’s apparent that smaller areas can love their radio
stations. The station is a real symbol of pride.
Despite the excellent performances of top notch
commercial and BBC stations in my home patch of Nottinghamshire, Mansfield FM, the commercial station serving a town some
15 miles from Nottingham’s centre, punches a great 28% reach.
BBC local radio’s 40 stations use 93 FM transmitters. Whilst
there is some split frequency use, there is the potential for more. Putting
to one side any relevant OFCOM operating framework considerations, could there be merit in the
BBC implementing further localisation, at a time when commercial radio
is taking steps in exactly the opposite direction for quite understandable
reasons? Yes, it's been done before in some areas, but times change. And how well was it done?
Could BBC local stations originate significant additional hyper-local
programming for proud distinct areas, where they naturally exist, opting in and out of the mother ship for parts of the day or week?
As my old colleague Keri Jones illustrated to me, this
happens overseas. The tiny ABC South West Western Australia generates a breakfast
show for the small, remote town of Bunbury. When they are not doing their own
thing, they relay ABC South Coast in Albany which offers programming for a
slightly larger, but still rural, part of W Australia. When ABC South Coast
isn’t creating local shows, they relay ABC Radio Perth from the state capital
of Western Australia. ABC Radio Perth provides local content until 10pm, then
it’s national local radio programming overnight.
So, in dinky little Bunbury, the programming hierarchy is:
Bunbury – Albany South Coast – Perth – National.
This is eminently deliverable from existing BBC local premises
and infrastructure, and I believe existing resource. With DAB simulcasts too, the ‘home’ service could continue
to be broadcast across the whole area, if desired. Or – the 128 kbps multiplex DAB capacity could even be split too – providing more than one service at once, albeit
across the whole patch.
And, as BBC local radio listeners start to listen to more content 'on-demand', will there be further opportunities to create and disseminate hyper-local audio which is not even broadcast?
At a time when we can personalise all our media choices, should radio be offering something a little more tailored? Would radio which sets its stall out to 'do local' do better if it were more local?
Find the broadcaster who really knows and loves their subsidiary town and get them on-air to their neighbours.
And, as BBC local radio listeners start to listen to more content 'on-demand', will there be further opportunities to create and disseminate hyper-local audio which is not even broadcast?
At a time when we can personalise all our media choices, should radio be offering something a little more tailored? Would radio which sets its stall out to 'do local' do better if it were more local?
Find the broadcaster who really knows and loves their subsidiary town and get them on-air to their neighbours.
And now the news where you are. Or maybe not quite where you are - but a big city down the road.
Grab my book 'Radio Moments': 50 years of radio - life on the inside. A personal and frighteningly candid reflection on life in radio now and then. The drama - the characters - the headaches - the victories.
Also 'How to Make Great Radio'. Techniques for today's presenters and producers. Great for newcomers - and food for thought if you've been doing it years.
Need a conference speaker or help with strategic projects - or coaching or broadcast training? If we get on OK, I'd love to work with you.
Grab my book 'Radio Moments': 50 years of radio - life on the inside. A personal and frighteningly candid reflection on life in radio now and then. The drama - the characters - the headaches - the victories.
Also 'How to Make Great Radio'. Techniques for today's presenters and producers. Great for newcomers - and food for thought if you've been doing it years.
Need a conference speaker or help with strategic projects - or coaching or broadcast training? If we get on OK, I'd love to work with you.
No comments:
Post a Comment